Pe-Trae-Us Rhymes With?

General David Pe-trae=us has, by suggesting hecounterinsurgency program, as outlined in the
can accomplish mission impossible, winning thePetraeus handbook are political winning legitimacy
so-called war in Iraq, which in truth and fact is notfor the government and undermining the claims of
a war, but rather an armed occupation. At timesrebels. A counterinsurgency program could best
what is going on in Iraq has been confused withbe described as armed social work, according to
the war on terror which itself is a misnomer.Williams and it may be too late for social work.
Petraeus, a four star general who has beenThe list of generals who have criticized the war
tasked with rebuilding Iraq's security forces andeffort thus far, reads like a who's who of the
running this latest surge, wrote Counterinsurgencyarmed forces. Most have waited until they were
101, the army handbook on fighting insurgencies.safely retired to comment. Those who have had
Given the fact that we are in the middle of a civilthe courage to speak their minds while still in have
war in Iraq, as well as a strong insurgency, hisbeen forced into retirement. Major Gen. Paul Eaton
own handbook would suggest our chances ofwas the first to speak out. He rightfully blamed
succeeding are slim to none. Gen. Petraeus is saidRumsfeld for complicating the U.S. mission. Marine
to have a superior intellect and a knack forLt. Gen Gregory Newbold charged Rumsfeld, Paul
politics, all of which will be needed to succeed.Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith with a casualness and
Unfortunately, it appears to be a case of too littleswagger that is the special province of those who
too late. It is therefore unlikely, his ego and trackhave never had to execute these missions or bur
record notwithstanding, that he will succeed inthe results. Brig. Gen. James Marks said, "Clearly
Iraq, where others have failed.the presence of more combat forces on the
According to journalist Kristian Williams, whoground would have been needed." Maj. Gen. John
recently wrote a feature article on Gen. Petraeus,Batiste, who likes the others, spoke from practical
"Mounting a successful counterinsurgency is aexperience in Iraq said, Rumsfeld did not seek nor
dangerous balancing act. Any sign of weaknessdid he accept the counsel of field commanders.
benefits the insurgents, who will exploit theMaj. Gen. John Riggs and Maj Gen.Charles J.
atmosphere of uncertainty and insecurity in theirSwannack, former field commander of the 82nd
effort to discredit the government. But if theAirborne, supported his statement. Retired Marine
military is overbearing and oppressive, theGeneral Zinni said Rumsfeld should be held
insurgents can use public resentment and sincereresponsible for a series of blunder, starting with
grievances to gain support and justify violence. Itthrowing away 10 years worth of planning, plans
is not enough to win battles if the governmentthat had taken into account what we would face
loses the backing of the population in the process."in an occupation of Iraq. The war to date has
The real war in Iraq was won with the dissolutionbeen so mismanaged it's amazing that we haven't
of the Iraqi army and the capture of Saddam.had a coup, with the generals temporarily taking
What has proven far more difficult is theover the government until such time as the
occupation, which has cost our soldiers' lives andpeople can find a competent leader. If Gen.
horrific injuries, not to mention the civilianPetraeus were to be honest, which he might well
casualties.be forced to do by September, he would have
In the Petraeus handbook there are dos andtold the President, who apparently lives in a
don'ts, most of what has occurred in Iraq hasbubble, the war isn't winnable.
been in the don't column. From the outset theThis is not to suggest that it wasn't winnable at
generals requested a troop level sufficient toone time, but the strategy was flawed. The ratio
accomplish their mission, which wasn't alwaysof troops to population that Petraeus suggests in
clear. Under former Secretary of Offense Donaldhis handbook is not being met, even with the
Rumsfeld, the requests for more troops weresurge. As we are witnessing daily, we may secure
repeatedly denied. In Mosul where Petraeus hadone area, only to see another explode. We do not
distinguished himself in 2003, with hishave enough troops to effectively police all of
hearts-and-minds approach, Rumsfeld thwarted hisIraq. Petraeus is entertaining a fool to suggest
good work in 2004. Petraeus used the 101stthat he can succeed where others have failed.
Airborne to establish and overwhelming presenceInsanity is doing the same thing over and over
in the city. This was supported by foot patrols.again, while expecting a different result. At the
Local elections were held and reconstructionrisk of being redundant, the war aspect of the
money was liberally dispensed. Under Petraeus,Iraq debacle has been won. Our troops have done
Mosul became one of the few pacified areas inall that was requested of them. There is no
Iraq. Unfortunately, Mr. Rumsfeld, in typical fashionreason for them to remain. There are upstanding
couldn't leave well enough alone. He replaced theAmerican citizens like Massachusetts Sen. Ted
Airborne with a much lighter Stryker force. TheKennedy on the no fly list, it is seriously doubtful
stryker Brigade halted the foot patrols and thethat a rag-tag bunch of terrorist hell-bent on
local government efforts. Shortly thereafter Mosulfollowing us here to blow themselves up, could
was in chaos. As Williams puts it, the questionescape scrutiny. Chaos exists in Iraq now, how
facing Petraeus now is whether that process canbad does bad have to get before the President
be reversed three years later, on a much largeracknowledges it? Petraeus, has become his latest
scale. Williams notes, "It is as important to meetacolyte, saying what the leader wants to hear,
the population's needs as to hunt down theinstead of what he needs to hear, in so doing, he
enemy. We are not winning the hearts and mindsbetrays the men and women in uniform who are
of the Iraqi people who rightfully see us as anbeing asked to carry out a fools mission.
occupying force. The ultimate aims of theCopyright 2007. All rights are reserved.